Why do you think it is a good thing we went and intervened with Kuwait and Iraq dissagreements? And why not?

<h3>Why do you think it is a good thing we went and intervened with Kuwait and Iraq dissagreements? And why not?</h3>

Why do you think it is a good thing we went and intervened with Kuwait and Iraq dissagreements? And why not?


<strong>Kuwait best answer:</strong>
<p><i>Answer by David H</i><br/>Dissagreement is a rather weak word. Saddam invaded Kuwait. Our response was a good thing. We didn't rush into it. We built a real coalition. We threw him out of Kuwait, damaged his military irreparably, and got the flock out. It was the most brilliant war I've ever seen waged. What a difference a single generation makes. The second Iraq war under junior was the most misguided mistake of a war I've ever seen waged. At least in Vietnam we had half a country on our side.</p>
<p><strong>Kuwait Elections-1281</strong>
<img alt="Kuwait" src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7159/6782137515_5a8c0642a4.jpg" width="400"/><br/>
<i>Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/73905487@N05/6782137515">Kuwaitelections2012</a></i>
Kuwait Transparency Society members meet with volunteers to discuss procedures related to the Feb. 2 parliamentary elections. About 30 international observers, mostly from the Arab Network for Election Democracy, will monitor the election, along with 300 local volunteers. About 285 candidates are running in the poll for a new 50-member parliament.</p>

---

Orignal From: Why do you think it is a good thing we went and intervened with Kuwait and Iraq dissagreements? And why not?