China Diplomatic Policy Leaves Some Questions

China Diplomatic Policy Leaves Some Questions

china

It appears that China's diplomatic relations are moving forward with its neighbors however, there are some questions the need to be addressed. First of all we note that every time someone is a little upset with the U.S. on an ethics issue China moves in to establish diplomatic ties and replace our relationship with that country. When a nation wishes to do business at a level, which is unethical by Western standards the United States backs off, but in doing so they leave the door open for China to move in an establish a closer relationship. Good for them right? Well if it is an ethics issues then what does this say about China, their ethics and the Worlds abilities to trust their motives?

Let's take the recent North Korean negotiations over nuclear arms, which were actually making some headway. North Korea was moving forward towards a more open an honest relationship with the United States. Then all of a sudden they flipped and instead opened relationships with China at a great larger level, perhaps even using counterfeit US Dollars as currency in paying off the Debts that North Korea owes to China? Speculation.

Another example is Pakistan, where much of Al Queda lives and the U.S. special teams are strategically taking out Al Queda strongholds and buildings using Predator Drones and hellfire missiles. Pakistan has not helped us in removing these terrorists, although they work little hard to pretend to, of course to their credit they do have a large population which is somewhat anti-US and they even had fired on our Rescue Helicopters there to help assist in the Pakistani Earthquake. Now the Pakistan leader and general says that the U.S. is crossing the line on "Pakistani Sovereignty." The general has canceled the deal to buy F-16s from the United States and is entering the relationship with China to buy and co-build fighter aircraft. Inferior aircraft? Yes, but that is not the point here.

China is also in close relationships with Iran. Has sold them ICBMs capable of carrying nuclear warheads over 1295 miles and other more sensitive technologies, which is problematic as well. Sure we have discussed this, but now China liking this deal and customer and looking for oil to buy to feed its new appetite, blocks UN Security Council resolutions to stop Iranian enrichment of Atomic Bombs?

However, what really do these nations stand to gain from her relationship with China; Protection or perceived protection, well certainly Iran is getting their monies worth at the UN and North Korean Leader lives another day to taunt the USA? China wants to continue their growth and new customers for the items they produce including weapons, but in trade what will these nations sell China? I submit to you that China would like to buy energy assets, oil and raw materials. Is North Korea going to grow ethanol for China? Obviously Iran will sell them oil but North Korea still owes the money in trade deals. What can Pakistan sell them?

We also find China is establishing relationships with Venezuela, Cuba and Mexico. In Cuba they will be drilling for oil and natural gas which are in the same fields underneath the Gulf of Mexico and off the coast of Key West that the United States will not allow companies to drill for. Meanwhile, Mexico is sending the legal aliens to invade our country and send money back to spur on Mexican Growth. Cuba is ready to pass the torch to Castro's Sons and Venezuela does not like the U.S. Anyone see a future worsening of the problem yet as protestors of illegal aliens assert their right to free speech in a nation they do not even belong in on May Day, a Communist Holiday for God Sake, wake up!

It seems China is willing to deal with less than ethical partners and some have even said that China has also dealt in U.S. counterfeit currency. China also will not allow free speech of the Internet and is believed to be testing Bio-weapons, which involved bird flu on their own peasants. Either China is so hungry for raw materials and worried about economic collapse, currency juggling and is becoming a PR façade, as civil unrest grows or they themselves need to be judged by the company they're willing to keep. Thus either the United States needs to go back and start dealing with less than ethical world leaders and adopt a less self-righteousness diplomatic policy for a more Machiavellian approach or the United States of America needs to strengthen its national defense, its borders and military and allies to a much higher level. If not be prepared to fight the whole friggin world and that means getting tough and doing the unthinkable in the coming decades and I do not mean precision bombs and guided smart ordinance unless it is massive destructive power. We must have that option if needed and not be afraid to defend if we fail to win friend and influence people. Not pretty to talk about, okay forget I said it, but don't forget the points here.

This is not taking anything away from China, as when nations grow very fast sometimes they have to do a little extra scrambling however, the lengths at which they will go to must be questioned, as some feel they are indeed over the border line of ethical political maneuvering on several fronts including but not limited to; fair and honest dealings at the United Nations, human rights violations and counterfeit currency, to name a few. It is difficult for a nation that deals with honesty and integrity, as well as transparency and businesses, which are forced to deal with a nation, which follows no rules, takes the advantage and cheats against their so-called allies, trading partners and friends. But their maneuvering is fun to watch isn't it, maybe that in itself is transparent? Pretend I did not say or think that, but understand and remember the point of contention these comments are indeed eluding too.

I predict that either China will need to have a war in order to continue the present growth or it will face civil unrest, a bloody and short lived Civil War and an Industrial Revolution all in the next two decades. The problem is if enough unethical and fanatical regimes get together with the help of China then we may actually be funding a war against the United States of America, even if China herself holds short of participating in directly. Many nations in the past periods have indeed sold weapons, munitions and partly bank rolled and funded both sides or all sides.

Am I alarmed by this well, yes and no; Yes because currently China is selling weapons and technology to Iran. China is buying advanced weapons systems from Israel, which is sharing technology with United States of America. China is buying advanced weapons systems and fighter planes, nuclear submarines and learning about missile technology from Russia. Iran sponsors international terrorism and is building nuclear weapons and buying anti-aircraft systems from Russia and God only knows what else. (Bio, torpedoes, nuclear, guidance systems, etc.)

Mexico, Venezuela and Cuba are close allies and many illegal immigrants are coming from those countries to the United States. Due to the business ties with China and the fact that we are already a large trading partner of theirs it would be silly for them to attack us directly however, who is to say they don't throw the Americans Companies out one day like Castro did and simply say thanks a lot and capture all the assets and technologies and move forward without us if things were to come to a head and the United States middle-class decided to boycott China or we had to cut trade ties due to their sponsoring of enemies against our nation? Additionally if the United States of America is attacked by international terrorists sponsored by Iran, who is to say how much of the technology used did not come from Russia and China?

Those who are watching the world events unfold and understand the Chinese multigenerational long-term plans for total domination of the world can see the future potential eventuality unfolding. If China starts to fall apart we all know from human experience and observation that desperate countries will do desperate things. One question which spurred this quick comment on China was, is that desperate time now; Or, or what? Precisely or what; Red Flags everywhere, well they were certainly popping up in my mind after all it is May Day Today. Perhaps soon China will force reunification with Taiwan, raise taxes and attempt to use that as forward propulsion fuel for their growing economy so they can maintain their system and this might catch the U.S. in a quagmire. We should not take our eye off that ball at all.

So what's is the U.S. do? What does the US need to do right now today on this multi-dimensional chessboard? Well, we need to be bold and stop playing pansy ass games with others who are playing for keeps and are playing with a team of unethical players. We need a 70 hour war with Iran to prove our air superiority and domination in the world and can we need to tell China to stand down and Russia to mind their own business, as we take care of a little unfinished business in Iran. We need to do this now before further diplomatic ties are sought or before Iran creates the media events to unite the air of world against the Western world.

Next we need to allow our oil companies to drill in those areas that are in U.S. waters off the coasts where Cuba in China are planning to drill. We need to remove Castro from power and make Cuba another Puerto Rico. We must move the Mexican border 300 miles into Mexico and call this a Free Zone under US Territorial Law, as well as set up lethal virtual fences on the current border.

Since Russian bomber planes have made undetected in two Canadian airspace by flying over the North Pole we need to push for middle and Western Canada to secede and join the United States of America as a territory work on this for a 5-10 year project. We need to open relationships with North Korea and offer to buy ethanol from them if they're willing to make it. If not help them with technologies and grants to sell ethanol to Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Taiwan or Australia. The United States of America has not been aggressive enough in our overseas diplomatic relations and we need to start aggressively promoting this. Further our President needs to get out more and meet with world leaders, without being attacked politically every time he goes on a trip, as some liberal group starts a negative PR media slander event. Our political divide and attacks are a serious nuisance and detriment to the very important World Chess Game and we need to keep our eye on the ball and not divide ourselves.

Anyway some food for thought for the coffee shop, your turn to talk now. Meanwhile I am enjoying this new voice activated software and just thinking out loud today, so you may do with this information what you wish, I just cannot turn off my Blue Blood genes or the mind of mine. Consider all this in 2006.

Hong Kong, China shares rise, Chinese property strong

china
(Updates to midday) * HSI up 0.1 pct, CSI300 firms 0.4 pct * China property plays strong, equity funds up stakes in sector in Q1 * Huaneng strong after Q1 earnings, Goldman Sachs reiterates "buy" * Foxconn jumps on Apple's superlative earnings By ...

>TOP 5 bestselling product about china

[amzn_multi_product_inline keyword='china' count='5' page='1' sort='' category='']

Germany-China look to spur growth

Leaders meet at the Hannover Industrial Fair as both industrial giants look to forge closer ties than ever.
china Video Rating: 4 / 5

---

Orignal From: China Diplomatic Policy Leaves Some Questions